logo

Open Spaces In the News

SearchRSS Feed

Rockford Register Star - 2007-06-27

Editorial: Illinois needs to use land money as it was intended (new window)

 

We all cheered when Roy Gayle Park was saved last year. It was a heroic effort that combined the skills of Rockford Pony League executives, the Rockford Park District and the Winnebago Park District.

The Rockford Park District received half the money to buy Roy Gayle from an Open Space Land And Development grant. Half came from the league.

Money for parks such as Roy Gayle in communities across Illinois will be at risk if the money to make land purchases is not available. The money is available, if lawmakers keep their hands off it.

But as with other dedicated funds in the state, money has been, or will be, diverted to other purposes.

When property changes hands in Illinois, people pay a Real Estate Transfer Tax. A percentage of that tax is directed into the OSLAD account. In 2003, $29 million was diverted into the state’s general fund.

In 2005, less than half of the money generated by the tax was used to buy land. In 2006, only 32 percent of the money was used for its intended purpose.

The 2007 state budget was a good one. About $32 million was allocated, but the 2008 budget that lawmakers are haggling over in Springfield now only has $24 million available.

A coalition of environmental groups wants $36 million to be allocated in the 2008 budget. Their request is reasonable, considering the fund has more that twice that amount, about $80 million, in it.

Many worthwhile projects will be rejected and conservation opportunities will be missed if there’s not enough money available to buy land for parks, recreational lands, wildlife habitat and natural areas.

Money collected for a specific purpose should be used for that purpose. Unfortunately, in Illinois, the trend has been to take dollars from funds targeted for roads, student loans and others to prop up an ailing state budget.

Land acquisition is a particular need. The state ranks last — that’s right, last — among Midwestern states in acres protected per capita.

OSLAD, started in 1986, is a good program, but it is not the only one. The Natural Areas Acquisition Fund also is financed by the Real Estate Transfer Tax. That fund is used to protect ecologically vulnerable areas. It too deserves full funding. There is $12 million in unappropriated money in the fund, and environmental groups would like to see $28 million used. Another reasonable request.

OSLAD and NAAF are two ways the state can make money available for land purchases. A third would be setting aside money in a capital budget for open spaces.

The 1999 capital budget created the Open Lands Trust that was used to finance local projects such as land acquisition by the Winnebago County Forest Preserve in 2003; money for Sugar River Greenway II in 2003, a grant for the Nygren Wetland Trail Access in 2001 and a grant for the Stone Bridge Trail in 2002.

The Open Lands Trust ran out of money in 2003, and the state has not had a capital budget since Gov. Rod Blagojevich took office.

We don’t have to look far for an example of how it should be done. Wisconsin has recommitted about $50 million per year for open spaces under its Stewardship 2000 program. Wisconsin already ranks second in the Midwest in state-owned recreation acres per capita.

Wisconsin is ahead of Illinois and continues to invest in itself.

There’s only so much land available, and Illinois needs to secure space so its residents can enjoy the great outdoors.